Texans vs Pittsburgh Steelers Match Player Stats
Did the Texans Dismantle the Steelers? Every Stat You Need
Houston came into Acrisure Stadium for the AFC Wild Card game and left with a 30–6 win. The texans vs pittsburgh steelers match player stats tell the story of a complete offensive and defensive performance that Pittsburgh had no answer for.
The Steelers scored only two field goals. Aaron Rodgers was sacked four times, threw one interception that was returned for a touchdown, and fumbled in the red zone at the worst possible moment. Houston did not just win — they controlled the game from the first snap to the last.
Final Score & Quarter-by-Quarter Breakdown
AFC Wild Card — January 13, 2026 Pittsburgh Steelers (Home) 6 — Houston Texans (Away) 30 Venue: Acrisure Stadium, Pittsburgh, PA
| Quarter | PIT (Steelers) | HOU (Texans) |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 3 | 0 |
| Q2 | 3 | 7 |
| Q3 | 0 | 0 |
| Q4 | 0 | 23 |
| Total | 6 | 30 |
Pittsburgh led 3–0 heading into Q2, and again 6–7 late in the second quarter. Then everything flipped. Houston’s defense suffocated Rodgers in Q3, and the Texans erupted for 23 fourth-quarter points to seal one of the most decisive Wild Card wins of the 2025 NFL postseason.
Scoring Plays: How the Texans vs Steelers Game Unfolded
Understanding the texans vs pittsburgh steelers match player stats means tracking each score:
| Time | Play | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 6:06 | Chris Boswell 32-yard FG | PIT 3–0 HOU |
| Q2 8:34 | C.J. Stroud pass to C. Kirk (6 yd TD) | PIT 3–6 HOU |
| Q2 8:28 | Ka’imi Fairbairn extra point | PIT 3–7 HOU |
| Q2 2:00 | Boswell 35-yard FG | PIT 6–7 HOU |
| Q4 13:12 | Fairbairn 51-yard FG | PIT 6–10 HOU |
| Q4 11:34 | Aaron Rodgers fumble — S. Rankins TD | PIT 6–16 HOU |
| Q4 11:23 | Fairbairn extra point | PIT 6–17 HOU |
| Q4 3:43 | W. Marks 13-yd rushing TD | PIT 6–23 HOU |
| Q4 3:38 | Fairbairn extra point | PIT 6–24 HOU |
| Q4 2:52 | Rodgers INT returned 50 yds by C. Bullock — TD | PIT 6–30 HOU |
Four of Houston’s five scoring drives came in the fourth quarter. The Texans did not just pull away — they blew the door off.
Complete Team Stats: Texans vs Steelers
| Statistic | HOU (Texans) | PIT (Steelers) |
|---|---|---|
| Final Score | 30 | 6 |
| Total Yards | 408 | 175 |
| Passing Yards | 250 | 148 |
| Rushing Yards | 164 | 63 |
| First Downs | 21 | 13 |
| Plays Run | 66 | 56 |
| Avg Gain Per Play | 6.2 | 3.1 |
| Turnovers | 3 | 2 |
| Sacks Taken | 3 | 4 |
| Sack Yards Lost | 6 | 36 |
| Penalties | 6 | 3 |
| Penalty Yards | 44 | 24 |
| Pass Completion % | 65.6% | 52.9% |
| Passer Rating | 86.7 | 52.1 |
| Rushing Attempts | 31 | 18 |
| Avg Rush Yards | 5.3 | 3.5 |
| Possession Time | 32:22 | 27:38 |
| Punts | 3 | 6 |
| Touchdowns | 4 | 0 |
| Field Goals Made | 1/1 | 2/2 |
The texans vs pittsburgh steelers match player stats show a total mismatch in yardage. Houston gained 408 yards; Pittsburgh managed only 175. The Texans ran 10 more plays and averaged more than twice the gain per snap (6.2 vs 3.1).
Houston Texans Offensive Stats vs Steelers
Passing (C.J. Stroud):
- Completions: 21 of 32 (65.6%)
- Passing Yards: 250
- Touchdowns: 1
- Interceptions: 1
- Passer Rating: 86.7
- Longest Pass: 46 yards
- Sacks Taken: 3
Rushing:
- Attempts: 31
- Yards: 164
- Average: 5.3 yards per carry
- Touchdowns: 1 (W. Marks, 13 yards, Q4)
- Longest Rush: 20 yards
Receiving:
- Targets: 32
- Receptions: 21
- Receiving Yards: 250
- Touchdowns: 1 (C. Kirk, 6 yards, Q2)
- Yards After Catch: 95
- Longest Reception: 46 yards
Houston Texans Defensive Highlights:
- Sacks: 4
- Sack Yards: 36
- Tackles for Loss: 8 (for 19 yards)
- Interceptions: 1 (C. Bullock, 50-yard return TD)
- QB Hits: 12
- Forced Fumbles: 2
- Fumble Recoveries: 1
Pittsburgh Steelers Offensive Stats vs Texans
Passing (Aaron Rodgers):
- Completions: 18 of 34 (52.9%)
- Passing Yards: 148
- Touchdowns: 0
- Interceptions: 1 (returned for TD)
- Passer Rating: 52.1
- Sacks Taken: 4
- Sack Yards Lost: 36
- Poor Throws: 8
- Fumbles: 2
Rushing:
- Attempts: 18
- Yards: 63
- Average: 3.5 yards per carry
- Touchdowns: 0
- Longest Rush: 14 yards
Pittsburgh Steelers Defensive Highlights:
- Sacks: 3
- Tackles for Loss: 3
- Interceptions: 1
- Passes Defended: 6
- QB Hits: 3
- Forced Fumbles: 2
What Decided the Texans vs Steelers Playoff Game?
Three factors separated these two teams in the texans vs pittsburgh steelers match player stats:
1. The Aaron Rodgers Fumble Changed Everything At Q4 11:34, with Pittsburgh still within single digits (6–10), Rodgers was sacked at the PIT 33 and fumbled. Solomon Rankins recovered the ball and returned it for a touchdown. That play turned a 4-point Texans lead into a 10-point advantage and broke Pittsburgh’s spirit entirely.
2. Stroud Controlled the Clock Houston possessed the ball for 32:22 — nearly five minutes more than Pittsburgh. With 31 rushing attempts averaging 5.3 yards, the Texans kept Rodgers on the sideline and wore down a Steelers defense that had no answers for Houston’s balanced attack.
3. Houston’s Pass Rush Was Relentless The Texans hit Rodgers 12 times, sacked him 4 times for 36 yards, and forced 8 poor throws. Pittsburgh’s offensive line simply could not handle Houston’s defensive front.
Texans Season Context: How This Wild Card Win Fits In
The Houston Texans finished the 2025 regular season as AFC South champions. Key wins that shaped their path included a stunning 44–10 dismantling of the Baltimore Ravens in October and a 20–10 victory over the Kansas City Chiefs in December. Both wins proved this team could beat elite competition.
This Wild Card win over Pittsburgh — now fully captured in the texans vs pittsburgh steelers match player stats above — sent Houston into the Divisional Round, where they faced the New England Patriots. The Texans fell 28–16 in that game, ending a strong postseason run.
The Steelers, playing with Aaron Rodgers under center, never found their rhythm against Houston’s defensive pressure. Pittsburgh’s offense generated only 175 total yards — their joint-lowest output of the season.
Aaron Rodgers vs C.J. Stroud: Head-to-Head Quarterback Stats
| Category | C.J. Stroud (HOU) | Aaron Rodgers (PIT) |
|---|---|---|
| Completions | 21 | 18 |
| Attempts | 32 | 34 |
| Completion % | 65.6% | 52.9% |
| Passing Yards | 250 | 148 |
| TDs | 1 | 0 |
| Interceptions | 1 | 1 |
| Passer Rating | 86.7 | 52.1 |
| Sacks Taken | 3 | 4 |
| Poor Throws | 6 | 8 |
| Fumbles | — | 2 |
Stroud outperformed Rodgers in every meaningful category. The passer rating gap — 86.7 to 52.1 — reflects how one-sided the passing battle truly was in the texans vs pittsburgh steelers match.
Bonus: Knicks vs Spurs NBA Finals Game 3 Player Stats
The New York Knicks are currently battling the San Antonio Spurs in the 2025–26 NBA Finals. Game 3 at Madison Square Garden ended in a 115–111 Spurs victory, with Victor Wembanyama delivering a spectacular individual performance. Here are the full knicks vs pacers match player stats-style box scores from this high-stakes contest:
Game 3 — NBA Finals | SAS 115 — NYK 111 June 9, 2026 | Madison Square Garden, New York
| Period | NYK (Knicks) | SAS (Spurs) |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 22 | 33 |
| Q2 | 42 | 24 |
| Q3 | 27 | 35 |
| Q4 | 20 | 23 |
| Total | 111 | 115 |
New York Knicks Player Stats — NBA Finals Game 3
| Player | Pos | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FG% | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OG Anunoby | F | 28 | 5 | 1 | — | 2 | 69.2% | -3 |
| Jalen Brunson | G | 32 | 5 | 5 | — | — | 44.0% | -9 |
| Josh Hart | F | 16 | 9 | 5 | — | — | 60.0% | -7 |
| Karl-Anthony Towns | C | 11 | 8 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 40.0% | +6 |
| Jordan Clarkson | G | 10 | 3 | 1 | 1 | — | 57.1% | +8 |
| Mikal Bridges | G | 2 | 5 | 2 | — | 1 | 20.0% | +11 |
| Mitchell Robinson | C-F | 5 | 4 | — | — | — | 66.7% | -13 |
| Jose Alvarado | G | 4 | 3 | 1 | — | — | 40.0% |
Jalen Brunson led the Knicks with 32 points on 11/25 shooting, adding 5 rebounds and 5 assists. He went to the free throw line 8 times and hit 7. Despite the effort, his -9 rating reflects how the Spurs countered his drives throughout the fourth quarter.
OG Anunoby was devastating in spots — 28 points on 69.2% shooting with 3-of-7 from three. His 82.5% true shooting percentage was the Knicks’ best mark on the night.
San Antonio Spurs Player Stats — NBA Finals Game 3
| Player | Pos | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FG% | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victor Wembanyama | C | 32 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 61.1% | +7 |
| Stephon Castle | G | 23 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 57.1% | +6 |
| Dylan Harper | G | 13 | 9 | 4 | — | — | 27.8% | -8 |
| De’Aaron Fox | G | 12 | 3 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 28.6% | -7 |
| Julian Champagnie | F | 12 | 1 | 3 | 1 | — | 44.4% | +8 |
| Devin Vassell | F | 11 | 4 | — | — | — | 75.0% | +12 |
| Keldon Johnson | F-G | 7 | 2 | — | 1 | — | 60.0% | +14 |
| Luke Kornet | C-F | 2 | 5 | 2 | 1 | — | 0.0% | -3 |
Victor Wembanyama delivered the defining performance of the game. His final line — 32 points, 8 rebounds, 6 assists, 2 steals, 3 blocks — on 61.1% shooting is the kind of complete two-way display that defines franchise superstars. His 72.9% true shooting and efficiency score of 46 were the highest marks of any player on either team.
Stephon Castle was equally critical with 23 points on 57.1% shooting, 5 rebounds, and 5 assists. His 69.1% true shooting made him the Spurs’ most efficient scorer alongside Wembanyama.
Knicks vs Spurs Team Stats Comparison — Game 3
| Category | NYK (Knicks) | SAS (Spurs) |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 111 | 115 |
| FG% | 45.5% | 46.4% |
| 3P% | 35.1% | 35.3% |
| FT Made/Att | 18/22 | 25/32 |
| True Shooting % | 56.8% | 58.6% |
| Total Rebounds | 56 | 48 |
| Assists | 18 | 28 |
| Steals | 4 | 7 |
| Turnovers | 13 | 8 |
| Second Chance Pts | 21 | 10 |
| Fast Break Pts | 15 | 5 |
| Points in Paint | 46 | 44 |
| Bench Points | 22 | 25 |
| Biggest Lead | 7 | 12 |
The Spurs won this game on ball movement. Their 28 assists against only 8 turnovers (assist-to-turnover ratio of 3.5) meant San Antonio generated clean looks consistently. The Knicks’ 13 turnovers, which led to 21 Spurs points, was the decisive difference in a 4-point game.
What Do These Stats Tell Us About the NBA Finals?
The Spurs lead the 2025–26 NBA Finals 2–1 heading into Game 4. Three things stand out from the combined knicks vs spurs data:
- Wembanyama is simply the best player on the floor. His efficiency score (46) and true shooting (72.9%) are at a level other players in this series haven’t touched.
- The Knicks win when they run. New York’s 15 fast-break points and 21 second-chance points show their best basketball comes from hustle, not halfcourt execution.
- Brunson needs more help in crunch time. He scored 32 but finished -9. The fourth quarter belonged to the Spurs, who outscored New York 23–20 to close it out.
Game 4 is scheduled for June 11, 2026, back at Madison Square Garden.
FAQs: Texans vs Steelers + Knicks Player Stats
What was the final score of the Texans vs Steelers playoff game? Houston Texans won 30–6 over the Pittsburgh Steelers in the AFC Wild Card on January 13, 2026. The game was played at Acrisure Stadium in Pittsburgh. Houston scored 23 points in the fourth quarter alone.
How did Aaron Rodgers perform in the Texans vs Steelers game? Aaron Rodgers completed 18 of 34 passes for 148 yards, zero touchdowns, one interception, and two fumbles. He was sacked four times for 36 yards lost. His passer rating was 52.1 — one of the worst performances of his career in a high-stakes game.
Who scored touchdowns for the Texans against the Steelers? Houston scored four touchdowns: C. Kirk (6-yard pass from Stroud, Q2), Solomon Rankins (fumble return, Q4), W. Marks (13-yard rush, Q4), and Corey Bullock (50-yard interception return, Q4). Ka’imi Fairbairn also hit a 51-yard field goal.
What were the texans vs pittsburgh steelers match player stats for total yardage? Houston gained 408 total yards (250 passing, 164 rushing). Pittsburgh managed only 175 total yards (148 passing, 63 rushing). The Texans averaged 6.2 yards per play versus the Steelers’ 3.1.
How did Victor Wembanyama perform in the Knicks vs Spurs NBA Finals Game 3? Victor Wembanyama scored 32 points on 61.1% shooting with 8 rebounds, 6 assists, 2 steals, and 3 blocks. His true shooting percentage was 72.9% and his efficiency score of 46 was the highest of any player on either team.
Who led the Knicks in scoring in NBA Finals Game 3? Jalen Brunson led the Knicks with 32 points on 11/25 shooting, adding 5 rebounds and 5 assists. OG Anunoby contributed 28 points on 69.2% shooting, while Josh Hart added 16 points with 9 rebounds.
Final Takeaway: Two Games, Two Dominant Performances
The texans vs pittsburgh steelers match player stats show a Houston team that arrived at the right time and dominated every phase of the game. From C.J. Stroud’s efficient passing to the fourth-quarter defensive explosion — four takeaways, one fumble return TD, one pick-six — the Texans were simply better.
On the NBA side, the Knicks vs Spurs Finals battle is genuinely compelling. Brunson and Anunoby are giving New York a chance, but Wembanyama’s total game is in a different class. The series sits at 2–1 Spurs heading into a crucial Game 4.
Both contests reward the fans who follow the numbers closely. Stats don’t just confirm the outcome — they explain exactly why it happened.
Want to stay updated on the Texans’ 2026 season schedule or the full Knicks vs Spurs Finals series stats? Bookmark this page and check back after every game for fresh breakdowns.
